Comparing GUM and top down approaches (PDF)
April 27, 2017
Training and consultancy for testing laboratories.
 | Tangram on How to apply the LSD method? |
 | migs on The Law of Averages and slot m… |
 | GLP Consulting Singa… on Homogeneity and stability of P… |
 | Charles Wilson on Homogeneity and stability of P… |
 | slotnextspin01 on Gambler’s Fallacy on The Law o… |
Tag Cloud
- ANOVA
- Design of Experiments
- Linear regression
- Decision Rule
- Significance testing
- Probability
- Randomization
- hypothesis testing
- outliers
- Sampling statistics
- Normal distribution
- Type I and II errors
- Sampling
- Sampling uncertainty
- Student's t-distribution
- Median
- Conformity testing
- Probability distribution
- Confidence interval
- Microbiology
- GUM
- uncertainty
- Decision rules
- profiency testing
- F-test
- Degrees of freedom
- Measurement error
- Control chart
- Risk
- Variance
- p-Value
- Precision
- Measurement bias
- ISO 17025
- propagation of uncertainty
- Monte Carlo
- Anderson-Darling
- repeatability
- interlab comparison
- standard uncertainty
- Bias
- measurement uncertainty
- t-test
- Method validation
- Confidence limits
- Risk assessment
- Excel spreadsheet
- Risk analysis
- Detection limit
- Accuracy
- Coverage factor
- Law of Averages
- IQR
- How to
- ISO FDIS 17025
- Central limit theorem
- Robust statistics
- standard additions method
- Internal quality control
- systematic error
- standard deviation
- Mean value
- ISO/IEC 17025
- analytical uncertainty
- Trueness
- Aerobic plate count
- Divisor
- Compliance
- Chi-square
- ISO 17025:2017
- Recovery
- Shewhart
- She
- Cross-checks
- Factorial design
- quartile
Leave a Reply